There is a scale in the picture with some nature factors on it’s left tray and some nurture factors on it’s right tray. And in the top of the picture, “The making of a successful scientist—nature or nurture?” reads
We can infer from that what counts more to make a successful scientist is nature but not nurture.
As we all know, interest leads to success. So, I think if a scientist is successful in one field, he or she must be much more interested in the field than others. Let’s take Einstein for example, if he were not so interested in physics, he would not have been so successful in its field. Thus, we can say the making of a successful scientist is nature.
However, the only nature is not enough, the nurture is also absolutely necessary. First, you must be in favor of the field, next, you must learn the knowledge connected with it, only in this way can you keep in up with the scientists who are researching in it and transcend them. During the course, you must learn from others, and so on. Finally you are likely to be a scientist. Imagine it, someone is very very interested in math, but he even doesn’t know what we can get if we add 1 to 1. Do you really think he can be a scientist, a successful scientist?
In a word, to make a successful scientist, nature and nurture are both important.
本文来源：https://www.2haoxitong.net/k/doc/6bddac89e53a580216fcfecc.html
文档为doc格式