文学再现的“镜式本质”与解构

文学再现的“镜式本质”与解构
作者：蒋继华
来源：《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第02期

        ［摘要］传统的文学观念往往基于文学与现实的关系探究文学的本质存在，这就形成了西方文论史上两种影响深远的创作模式：侧重于再现客观世界的模仿说和表现作家主观情感世界的创造论。这两种理论模式分别以镜和灯为喻，实乃是对文学的再现，一种广义的“再现”，因而具备基本相同的镜喻形态，体现传统观念的“镜式本质”特征。20世纪以来，文学的再现性结构遭到诸多学者的批判和解构。解构主义和马克思主义分别采取了不同的文本解构策略，呈现出不一样的批评风貌。

        ［关键词］模仿；创造；再现；解构

        ［中图分类号］I0［文献标识码］A［文章编号］1671-8372（2014）02-0098-05

        On the“mirror nature”of literary representation and its deconstruction

        JIANG Ji-hua

        （School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China）

        Abstract：The traditional literary concept often explores the nature of literature based on the relationship between literature and reality, thus forms two kinds of far-reaching creation modes in the history of western literary theory: one is the imitation theory on the representation of the objective world and the other is the creation theory on the expression of subjective emotion. These two theoretical modes take mirrors and lamps as their own metaphor respectively, the essence of which is the representation of the literature—a generalized “reproduction”, thus they have the same basic mirror metaphor forms, and embody the traditional concept of “mirror nature”. Since 20th century, the structure of literary reproducibility is criticized and deconstructed by many scholars. The deconstructionists and Marxists adopt different text deconstruction strategy showing a different style of criticism.

本文来源：https://www.2haoxitong.net/k/doc/9623df36951ea76e58fafab069dc5022abea46f9.html